This information is here for you. We know you're in a situation that only you can understand. Everything here is cited so that you can research and validate the facts. Your decision is valuable and so are you.
Information is sometimes difficult but always necessary when making decisions. We hope this helps you.
Don't miss this video with Dr. Anthony Levatino.
Dr Levatino has performed over 1200 abortions. He walks us through what happens during an abortion.
This is a 15 week ultrasound from Ultrasound Ireland. YouTube
91% of abortions occur during the first thirteen weeks of pregnancy.
Planned Parenthood
Click this link to see what happens during the first 13 weeks.
"In 2018, there were approximately 2,500 abortions per day in the United States. On average, 19% were Hispanic, 38% were black, and 35% were white. That translates to approximately 456 Hispanic children, 912 black children, and 840 white children. Though the white population in the U.S. outnumbers the black population by more than four to one, more black children are aborted each day than white children. In fact, abortion claims virtually the same number of black lives each year in the United States as all other causes combined".
"Vice President Harris has also refused to condemn late-term abortion. Progressives in the U.S. have advocated in the halls of Congress and in state capitols to allow late-term abortion up until the moment of birth. In the name of women's rights, government health leaders deny the remarkable achievements medicine has made in the 50 years since Roe v. Wade. Surgeons now operate on babies as early as the 16th week of pregnancy. Yet, nine U.S. states plus D.C. currently have laws with no week restrictions—a standard more radical than most of liberal Europe and on par with countries such as China and North Korea".
https://www.newsweek.com/harris-presidency-would-disaster-women-girls-opinion-1930172
"No limit: Six states and Washington, D.C., do not impose any term restrictions. That has not changed since the overturning of Roe". https://www.axios.com/2022/05/14/abortion-state-laws-bans-roe-supreme-court
"Today, Planned Parenthood Action Fund is proud to officially join the resounding chorus of support for Kamala Harris to be the next President of the United States." https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/pressroom/planned-parenthood-action-fund-endorses-kamala-harris-for-president
"'This is a very serious and a very complex situation that's being trivialized by Planned Parenthood'," Mize told Fox News Digital. "'It's being diminished, and it's being disrespected, the fact that this is a very complicated, very complex decision that these women are making, and, unfortunately, it's a carnival. They have blow-ups. They have food trucks. It's a bit of a show, unfortunately, and it diminishes the severity and significance of vulnerable women.'"
"Following the Dobbs decision giving legislators the power to once again protect life, fellow amicus brief signatory and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called for PRCs (pregnancy resource centers) to be shut down because she believes the loving care and resources they offer are 'torture.'
A few months later, now as vice president, Kamala Harris met with Democratic state attorneys general at the White House to commend them for 'taking on, rightly, the Crisis Pregnancy Centers.' She went on to describe the work of PRCs as 'predatory practices.'
In the months preceding these slanderous remarks, there was a spike in violent pro-abortion protestors vandalizing and threatening PRCs. At least 90 PRCs have been attacked since the leak of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision in 2022.
the Department of Health and Human Services notified the state of California that the law Harris co-sponsored requiring PRCs to advertise for abortion was unconstitutional".
https://washingtonstand.com/commentary/who-doesnt-like-pregnancy-resource-centers-kamala-harris
"Across the country, there are more than 2,750 centers of hope for women and men who unexpectedly learn they have conceived a child. They are called pregnancy resource centers (PRCs) or Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs). These organizations have an approval rate higher than 97.4% from the mothers and fathers they serve. In 2022, it is estimated that pregnancy resource centers donated $367,896,513 in goods and services to moms and dads in need. Some of the material needs they provided include 3,590,911 packs of diapers, 1,216,438 packs of wipes, 4,256,274 baby outfits, and 300,008 bottles of infant formula. But perhaps equally important, 409,409 clients attended parenting and prenatal programs at PRCs; 20,863 clients received after-abortion support, and 660,064 youth attended sexual risk avoidance education programs.
Under Trump, in recognition of the lives and taxpayer dollars they save, PRCs were eligible to receive taxpayer dollars through Title X funds. While this past year, Vice President Harris became the highest-ranking U.S. official to publicly visit an abortion business, the Trump administration was the first in history to visit a pregnancy resource center".
https://washingtonstand.com/commentary/who-doesnt-like-pregnancy-resource-centers-kamala-harris
Margaret Sanger & Planned Parenthood:
"Margaret Sanger, in 1921, founded the American Birth Control League, which later became Planned Parenthood. Ms Sanger is a self-proclaimed Eugnicist". (wikipedia)
"Ms Sanger's brand of eugenics is laid out in her published paper, "A Plan for Peace". In her paper, Ms Sanger argues for what she termed a 'Parliament of Population' . The object of the Population Parliament would be:
a) to raise the level and increase the general intelligence of the population.
b) to increase the population slowly by keeping the birth rate at its present level of fifteen per thousand, decreasing the death rate below its present mark of 11 thousand.
c) to keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feebleminded, idiots, morons, insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class barred by the immigration laws of 1924.
d) to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny (descendant 1) is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.
e) to ensure the country against future burdens of maintenance of numerous offspring as may be born of feebleminded parents, by pensioning all persons with transmissible disease who voluntarily consent to sterilization.
f) to give certain dysgenic (biologically defective 2) groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.
g) to apportion farm lands and homesteads for these segregated persons where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives".
https://www.issues4life.org/pdfs/1932_peaceplan_margaretsanger.pdf
"Unlike at an OB/GYN’s office, at Planned Parenthood, the ultrasound monitors showing the developing child are only seen by staff.
Former Planned Parenthood manager Sue Thayer has attested that staffers deliberately 'turn the monitor away so the mom can’t see it.'
Former Planned Parenthood employee Catherine Adair told the Washington Examiner in 2011 that workers would purposefully avoid providing information on what the child looked like, the child’s anatomical development, and the pain she could feel. She said that she was 'continuously reminded that when referring to the baby, the appropriate terminology was ‘clump of cells’ or ‘contents of the uterus.'
Live Action recently investigated 68 Planned Parenthood facilities across the country. Our investigators, posing as pregnant women wanting to keep their babies, contacted the facilities asking to get ultrasounds to check on their own and their babies’ health. Our undercover recordings show the women being turned away at 65 of the 68 facilities. Those facilities that had ultrasound machines told our investigators that they only use them for abortions".
"The Soviet Union under Vladimir Lenin is recognized as the first modern country to legalize induced elective abortion care. In the twentieth century China used induced abortion as part of a 'one-child policy' birth control campaign in an effort to slow population growth".
"Public Law 108-212) "A United States law that recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines 'child in utero' as 'a member of the species Homo Sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb'". en.wikipedia.org
For more information visit www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/1997.
"The Texas Heartbeat Act, Senate Bill 8 (SB 8), is an act of the Texas Legislature that bans abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, which normally occurs after about six weeks of pregnancy. The law took effect on September 1, 2021, after the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request for emergency relief from Texas abortion providers. It is the first time a state has successfully imposed a six-week abortion ban since Roe v. Wade, and the first abortion restriction to rely solely on enforcement by private individuals through civil lawsuits, rather than having state officials enforce the law with criminal or civil penalties. The act authorizes members of the public to sue anyone who performs or facilitates an illegal abortion for a minimum of $10,000 in statutory damages per abortion, plus court costs and
attorneys' fees".
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States conferred the right to have an abortion. The decision struck down many federal and state abortion laws, and caused an ongoing debate in the United States about whether, or to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, and what the role of moral and religious views in the political sphere should be. The decision also shaped debate concerning which methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication.
The case was brought by Norma McCorvey, known by the legal pseudonym "Jane Roe"—who, in 1969, became pregnant with her third child. McCorvey wanted an abortion, but she lived in Texas where abortion was illegal, except when necessary to save the mother's life. Her attorneys, Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, filed a lawsuit on her behalf in U.S. federal court against her local district attorney, Henry Wade, alleging that Texas' abortion laws were unconstitutional. A special three-judge court of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas heard the case and ruled in her favor The parties appealed this ruling to the Supreme Court.
On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision holding that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a fundamental "right to privacy", which protects a pregnant woman's right to an abortion. The Court also held that the right to abortion is not absolute and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and prenatal life. The Court resolved these competing interests by announcing a pregnancy trimester timetable to govern all abortion regulations in the United States. The Court also classified the right to abortion as "fundamental", which required courts to evaluate challenged abortion laws under the "strict scrutiny" standard, the most stringent level of judicial review in the United States.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court upheld the right to have an abortion as established by the "essential holding" of Roe v. Wade (1973) and issued as its "key judgment" the imposition of the undue burden standard when evaluating state-imposed restrictions on that right. Both the essential holding of Roe and the key judgment of Casey were overturned by the Supreme Court in 2022, with its landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The case arose from a challenge to five provisions of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982; among the provisions were requirements for a waiting period, spousal notice, and (for minors) parental consent prior to undergoing an abortion procedure. In a plurality opinion jointly written by associate justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter, the Supreme Court upheld the "essential holding" of Roe, which was that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution protected a woman's right to have an abortion prior to fetal viability.
The Court overturned the Roe trimester framework in favor of a viability analysis, thereby allowing states to implement abortion restrictions that apply during the first trimester of pregnancy. In its "key judgment," the Court overturned Roe's strict scrutiny standard of review of a state's abortion restrictions with the undue burden standard, under which abortion restrictions would be unconstitutional when they were enacted for "the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus." Applying this new standard of review, the Court upheld four provisions of the Pennsylvania law, but invalidated the requirement of spousal notification. Four justices wrote or joined opinions arguing that Roe v. Wade should have been struck down, while two justices wrote opinions favoring the preservation of the higher standard of review for abortion restrictions.
The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 (Pub.L. 108–105, 117 Stat. 1201, enacted November 5, 2003, 18 U.S.C. § 1531, PBA Ban) is a United States law prohibiting a form of late termination of pregnancy called "partial-birth abortion," referred to in medical literature by as intact dilation and extraction. Under this law, "Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both." The law was enacted in 2003, and in 2007 its constitutionality was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392,597 U.S. ___ (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. The court's decision overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), giving individual states the full power to regulate any aspect of abortion not preempted by federal law.
Leading Republican politicians praised the decision, while their Democratic counterparts denounced it, as did many international observers. Protests and counter protests over the decision occurred in many U.S. cities and internationally, with polling indicating that 55% to 60% of the public disapproved of overturning Roe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%27s_Health_Organization
"You made all the delicate, inner parts of my body
and knit me together in my mother’s womb.
Thank you for making me so wonderfully complex!
Your workmanship is marvelous—how well I know it".
Psalm 139:13
Copyright © 2024 Smart Girl - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.